"The problem is all inside your head", she said to me
The answer is easy if you take it logically
I'd like to help you in your struggle to be free
There must be fifty ways to leave your lover
Hopefully this will be one of the last times I go the photo excursion route. There's enough discrepancies in the months of September 1966 through April of 1967 in the Beatles tale to fill two volumes. Like, how did Paul McCartney & George Martin get time to do The Family Way? That's been bothering me the past week or two. But here we are again anyway.
In Paul Is Dead mythology, the concept states that the replacement is taller, parts his hair to his left, and doesn't look like the real James Paul McCartney. In effect, you get the below:
That works of course. It explains the years 1962 through 1966 very plainly. Until you get to :
Which throws the whole thing off. And there's plenty of evidence gathered to say that McCartney's hair naturally parted to the left anyway, and it was subverted over to the right in the beginning. Kinda lending to a theory that Paul was always going to be in question right from the start.
|What's wrong with my eyebrow??? What do you mean???|
Okay, let's say Paul McCartney is not a series of manufactured items on a treadmill. Let's say he's just a mad mother plucker. Then we need to identify what to look for when he goes on his plucking frenzies. Which can happen within the space of year.
ARCHETYPE I : The Loop the Loop
This is the high arcing, am I raising this up on purpose to be cool, or is this how my actual eyebrow is shaped right eyebrow.
ARCHETYPE II : What Goes Around Comes Around
This one is a variation on the arc, but it comes around to border the eye. Not seen as often, but it makes appearances.
ARCHETYPE III : The Straight and Narrow
This one shows up various times, making rare appearances it seems. Must be a mood thing.
If you ask me, it's one of the greatest deceptions ever undertaken. I rank it right up there with, I don't know, the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus. Yeah. That big!
Or maybe he just plucks his eyebrows and wears 3 inch heels on occasion. Maybe he was glam before glam was glam. Pre-glam. With the way The Beatles get credited for inventing everything from heavy metal to polka music, I wouldn't be surprised they'd get more accolade. (And if you ask me The Kinks were the prototype for most of what came after the British Invasion. Even with the glam thing.)
But here I am talking about music and culture and influence, while I'm looking at a guy who could be two people. Or even three. What's up with that!!! And if it is true, how deep does that deception go into the subconscious. Are there little Lady Madonna think packets littered amongst the brain cells? How much does this influence the way we behave, interact, take reality as it is in this world. Didn't Lennon say Nothing Is Real? Well Paul McCartney is a good indication to believe him. There seems to be nothing real about him. And when you get to that period between September 1966 and April 1967, the stories told don't seem real at all. They seem like outright lies. So whether he died or not, something is still amiss. If the photos are being tampered with, something is still amiss. No matter which angle you come in from, something is still amiss.
There must be 50 ways to leave it. Must be.